Criteria for funding and promotion lead to bad science

(PLOS) Scientists are trained to carefully assess theories by designing good experiments and building on existing knowledge. But there is growing concern that too many research findings may in fact be false. New research publishing Nov. 10 in open-access journal PLOS Biology by psychologists at the universities of Bristol and Exeter suggests that this may happen because of the criteria used in funding science and promoting scientists which, they say, place too much weight on novel, eye-catching findings.

from EurekAlert! - Social and Behavioral Science https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-11/p-cff110816.php