Friday 30 November 2012

Native Americans and Northern Europeans more closely related than previously thought by (author unknown)

Using genetic analyses, scientists have discovered that Northern European populations descend from a mixture of two very different ancestral populations, and one of these populations is related to Native Americans.



via ScienceDaily: Anthropology News http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121130151606.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Ffossils_ruins%2Fanthropology+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Fossils+%26+Ruins+News+--+Anthropology%29

A Note from the New Editor of the Anthropology of Work Review by jhoelle

There has rarely been a more exciting time to be a researcher at the intersection of economy and culture than the present. For this reason, I am very excited to be taking over as editor of the Anthropology of Work Review (AWR). The recent and dramatic economic upheavals have heightened our awareness of all issues related to the world of work. In light of our ongoing critical engagement with this domain of inquiry, anthropologists are well-positioned to make important contributions to the dynamic conversations that have been sparked in reaction to these changes.


I am thrilled to come on board as the editor of a thriving journal that has fostered a lively forum for the discussion of the anthropology of work under the careful eye of the outgoing editor, Michael Chibnik. He transformed AWR into a twice yearly, bound journal and his dedicated work has led to a significant increase in submissions to the journal in the past year. As the current editor I hope to continue to increase AWR’s profile by publishing important and timely anthropological research related to “work” broadly defined.


Without doubt in the coming years the model of scholarly publishing is going to evolve. The American Anthropological Association is certainly considering a number of different ways in which to address the issue of open access. Like others I support this trend, especially in light of the fact that so many of our anthropological colleagues working in less developed countries are currently unable to access the scholarly resources they need for their work due to their institutions’ financial limitations. However, I also recognize that there are significant expenses associated with publishing a journal, ones that are currently paid through the Wiley-Blackwell publishing agreement. My hope is that as a section we can take up this discussion in more detail over the coming year. I encourage you to post comments to the listserv or to contact me or our section’s president, Sam Collins, with comments and concerns regarding this important issue.


I encourage the submission of articles and photo essays from those working inside and outside academic contexts and from all subfields and area of specialty within anthropology. Theoretical and methodological discussions of the study of work and its contexts are welcome, including interdisciplinary, collaborative, and student submissions. Questions about potential manuscripts, theme issues, and photo essays can be sent to sarah.lyon@uky.edu. Queries about book and visual reviews should be sent to JimWeil, the AWR reviews editor, at jimweilanthro@gmail.com.


Contact SAW Contributing Editor Jeffrey Hoelle at hoelleja@gmail.com.






via Anthropology-News http://www.anthropology-news.org/index.php/2012/11/30/a-note-from-the-new-editor-of-the-anthropology-of-work-review/

Thursday 29 November 2012

Most of the harmful mutations in people arose in the past 5,000 to 10,000 years by (author unknown)

A study of the age of more than 1 million single-letter variations in the human DNA code reveals that most of these mutations are of recent origin, evolutionarily speaking. They arose as a result of explosive population growth, which provides more chances for new mutations to appear in offspring. Many of these mutations are harmful, some have no effect, and others are beneficial now or may provide an adaptive advantage for future generations.



via ScienceDaily: Anthropology News http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121129093951.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Ffossils_ruins%2Fanthropology+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Fossils+%26+Ruins+News+--+Anthropology%29

Wednesday 28 November 2012

Skeletons in cave reveal Mediterranean secrets by (author unknown)

Skeletal remains in an island cave in Favignana, Italy, reveal that modern humans first settled in Sicily around the time of the last ice age and despite living on Mediterranean islands, ate little seafood.



via ScienceDaily: Anthropology News http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121128182945.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Ffossils_ruins%2Fanthropology+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Fossils+%26+Ruins+News+--+Anthropology%29

Archaeologists discover shipwrecks, ancient harbor on coast of Israel by (author unknown)

Archaeologists have discovered the remains of a fleet of early-19th century ships and ancient harbor structures from the Hellenistic period at the city of Akko, one of the major ancient ports of the eastern Mediterranean. The findings shed light on a period of history that is little known and point to how and where additional remains may be found.



via ScienceDaily: Anthropology News http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121128162207.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Ffossils_ruins%2Fanthropology+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Fossils+%26+Ruins+News+--+Anthropology%29

Preserving the Past and Preparing for the Future by jrolston

The Association for Feminist Anthropology (AFA) will turn 25 during the 2013 annual meetings, pushing us to reflect on AFA’s past and future. The decade leading up to its foundation and activities since can be examined as part of scholarly and political shifts concerning women’s rights across and within cultures, time periods, and activities—including the growing multiplicity of perspectives about what constitutes a right or a woman. At the same time, more study is needed about how AFA and feminist anthropology have influenced such shifts in anthropology and feminisms since 1988.


Toward that end, under the leaderships of former presidents and board members, AFA created a collection of its records that is now part of the Smithsonian Institution (SI)’s National Anthropological Archives. Perhaps because other scholars are thinking along similar lines, the June 2012 issue of Gender & Development includes an article by Irene Tinker about documenting feminisms; in it, Tinker suggests that donors of records also consider being donors of financial support to cover archive costs. Part of AFA’s commitment to anthropology and the examination of its history is the (small) maintenance fee paid to SI that also serves as a reminder to encourage our colleagues, students, and selves to make use of the Smithsonian archives of feminist and other anthropologists, including those of the AFA.


Besides accessing the past, AFA is interested in setting terms for what might be forthcoming. We know that both feminisms and anthropology face challenges—from without and from within groups identifying as feminists and/or anthropologists—regarding their often critical studies of relationships and representations among humans. We know also that merely facing a challenge is insufficient and our forms of communication should be flexible, creative, and multiple without reproducing opacity or oppression. We also know we need to work together so that AFA can continue to provide its own challenges toward gender disparities and all of their many intersectional aspects.


We therefore maintain our practice of providing access to relevant new work from all subfields of anthropology and all forms of feminist activity. AFA as a section shares ideas and research through our web site and listserv and, beginning this year, through Twitter and Facebook. We use our Anthropology News column as a way for any member to share research and develop dialogues, and want your contributions. Meanwhile, what began as a section newsletter and evolved into the fully edited journal of Voices is part of AAA-wide discussions about how to best enter the next phase of publishing even as AFA members discuss the possibility of a peer-reviewed serial.


We also communicate via AFA-invited and sponsored sessions at the annual meetings. This year in San Francisco, we explore topics of concern and fascination among anthropologists generally and those explicitly feminist particularly. Launching off the meeting theme of “boundaries,” we include sessions on classifications within sex and gender, disabilities and activisms, and occupations and activities (including athletics, trafficking, parenting, teaching, and prostitution). Responding to recent events and ways to analyze them, we have sessions on forms of violence. Finally, we also have a session that includes as AFA’s guests several non-anthropologist practitioners and advocates discussing the US penal system as it increasingly includes certain categories of women among the incarcerated.


Perhaps because of these efforts, AFA has a growing membership in spite of the current global economic context. Out of concern for that context, we would like to keep membership fees low. Toward that end, I remind everyone to renew and to encourage others to join so that income from dues combines with that from Voices to keep AFA’s budget secure.


AFA also is expanding in its opportunities for member involvement, through planning sessions and workshops for the 2013 AAA annual meetings, including special sessions and events for the AFA 25thanniversary. If interested in helping with past, present, or future AFA endeavors, please start by contacting me, at afapres@gmail.com.


Jane Henrici, is president of the Association for Feminist Anthropology; study director at the Institute for Women’s Policy Research; and professional lecturer at the Global Gender Program, Elliott School of International Affairs, George Washington University.


Send communications and contributions to AFA Contributing Editors Damla Isik at disik@regis.edu and Jessica Smith Rolston at jrolston@mines.edu.






via Anthropology-News http://www.anthropology-news.org/index.php/2012/11/28/preserving-the-past-and-preparing-for-the-future/

Monday 26 November 2012

Using biomarkers from prehistoric human feces to track settlement and agriculture by (author unknown)

Geoscientists have used a biomarker from human feces in a new way to establish the first human presence, the arrival of grazing animals and human population dynamics in a landscape.



via ScienceDaily: Anthropology News http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/11/121126151049.htm?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+sciencedaily%2Ffossils_ruins%2Fanthropology+%28ScienceDaily%3A+Fossils+%26+Ruins+News+--+Anthropology%29

Friday 23 November 2012

When Having “Rights” is not Right by eguevara

Inequality in Inheritance for Muslim Women in Bangladesh


Introduction


In Bangladesh, the inheritance law for the Muslim is maintained in accordance with Islamic Sharia which gives women half of what men get in inherited property. Any proposition to change this law has been met with serious unrest and opposition. Our research shows that it is not only men who oppose it, but women themselves also contribute to perpetuating this inequality in the name of religion and social norms.


Inheritance law for Muslims in Bangladesh says that a daughter will get half of the son from father’s ancestral property and wife or wives will get one-eighth with a child and one-fourth without a child. If anybody has all daughters, his brothers’ children will get half of the share. The government of Bangladesh has tried to formulate Women Development Policy for ensuring gender equality but surprisingly it bypasses the issue of equal rights in inherited property. This commentary tries to highlight the main obstacles to ensure women’s inheritance rights on property in different spheres such as the government, society, community and the family. Conducting a preliminary survey on 60 middle-aged women in Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh we found that there is a complex range of factorssocial, administrative, and ideologicalunderlying the persistent gap between women’s legal rights and their actual ownership of land and also between ownership and control. Moreover, the actors (especially the women) involved in this process reject universal standards of gender equality and justify unequal distribution of property through dominant cultural discourses.


State and Women: Case Bangladesh


Inspired by the declaration of the decade of women’s development by the United Nations, Bangladesh has taken different measures to increase the gender balance in society from the late 70s. Originally the Constitution of Bangladesh guarantees equality of women and men and prohibits all kinds of discrimination based on sex, religion, caste and creed. In addition, the 2005 Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) addresses gender issues in a number of key areas, ie “Promoting Employment” and “Agriculture and Rural Development.” However, the main rule seems to be program based responses to the needs of women rather than formulating equality based policies and laws. The poverty reduction projects/programs focusing women are largely safety net programs which provide immediate cash/material benefit. But for promoting employment or sustainable rural development, these safety net measures are not sufficient. Women need access to and control over landed property to enter in the market as well as agriculture and development activities in real terms. The PRSP and latest five-year plan for economic development remains strategically illusive about women’s rights to inherited property.


A number of policies have been formulated in the last couple of decades regarding women development. In 1997, the government of Bangladesh formulated a national policy for the advancement of women which committed to eliminate discrimination against women and girls in all spheres and promoting women’s equality in areas such as education and training, health and nutrition, housing and shelter, political empowerment and public administration and the economy. The policy had a proposal for equal share of daughters (ie, same as her brothers), but that has not well taken by the “Islamist group and activists.” Due to huge political and religious demonstrations, the policy never saw the light. In the 2004 revision of the policy some significant changes of language were made which, according to the promoters of equal gender rights, actually lessens the opportunity for development of women. For example, the new policy removed promises of equal rights of women to inherited and landed property. In 2008, the caretaker government proposed another version of women development policy to promote a level playing field for women. But this policy replaced the phrase “inherited” with “landed and liquid” properties in which women would have equal rights. It specifically stipulated that to ensure women’s equal control over properties gained through the “market system”, the state would formulate new laws. But some newspapers wrongly interpreted it and stated that women would have equal rights to property. This caused a similar kind of outcry from different religious-political groups. In response, the law and religious affairs adviser of the caretaker government eventually said that the Women Development Policy 2008 is not a legislation at all and its does not deal with inheritance laws. It is just a document for discussions on how to protect women from repression and deception and on how to improve their conditions socially. To control in the increasing unrest regarding the policy, the government established a committee of Muslim religious leaders well versed in Islamic texts who proposed the replacement of the phrase “equal rights” to “just rights” in property for women. It is interesting from a human rights perspective as it is the state and male religious leaders who get to decide the “just” proportion for women in inherited property. The 2011 policy for women’s advancement has brought back some of the promises of the 1997 policy. For example, in section 25 it says that women would be give “full control” over earnings, credit, land and inherited or purchased property. However, it is interesting to note that there is no mention of “equal rights” or “equal share” to be assured in the inherited property.


It can be inferred that in Bangladesh religion has been used as an excuse for the skeptical stand of state regarding the issue of equal inheritance irrespective of gender. The protest against gender discrimination in terms of inheritance of property is rarely visible in any part of society except ones arranged by some Non-government Organizations who worked for human rights and gender equality. The policies and the resulting demonstration of political parties along with the strategic stance of the ruling political parties clearly indicate that the Muslim inheritance law will not be changed in near future. Such a demonstration and political unrest cannot by judged only by blaming religious dogmatism. Rather we should see this in relation to a traditionally patriarchal state, society and mindset.


Inheritance Laws and Practices


Inheritance practices are crucially important in regulating rights to property in a society in which the “competition for scarce resources” is fierce. For a significant majority of rural households, arable land is the single most important source of economic security against poverty in Bangladesh. The social status and political power in the rural settings are defined by the land (Agarwal 2002; Toufique and Turton eds, 2002). Moreover, it shapes the intra- and inter-household relationships. Cultural and traditional practices in Bangladesh continue to perpetuate the patrilineal mode of inheritance that excludes women from the inheritance rights. There is a cultural resistance towards women getting a share in the parental property (Rahman and van Shendel 1997; Mathew, 2010). Wives and daughters are sidelined from the formal ownership of land resources, while the husbands get rural land through inheritance and hence are wealthier in terms of disposable assets. Our survey shows that majority of women from all income groups, do not formally own property of their own and rarely inherit from the natal or affine families. Often women decline from asserting their inheritance rights, due to the fear of losing family ties, or acquiring the social stigma of being grasping and greedy and for the fear of losing the love of the natal family. Women value their relationship with their brothers to a great extent which would be threatened if they demand their share in property. As a result women usually do not risk the life-time guarantee of social support from their kin, which is especially useful at the time of economic or social crisis such as divorce or widowhood, for share in landed property.


In our survey, we found that social legitimacy is the crucial factor to ensure women’s share in property. Even when women get a share of property, they are not the real beneficiaries to utilize itit is controlled by a male member of the family. Many women accept this arrangement as the norm of society and consider themselves to be too weak to handle things as property. Moreover, the male dominated public sphere in Bangladesh such as the district courts, local administrator’s office, and village panchayet or governing body, make it difficult for women to claim their inheritance rights. The first obstacle in this case is to overcome the sociocultural barriers on physical movement of women in public spaces. Then the lack of information sources and indefinite timeline for solving court cases makes it economically unprofitable to legally demand shares in property. Only when the price of property is really very high and the women are backed by their socioeconomic standing that they find it worth it to challenge their brothers in the court. This is the last and the most extreme measure any woman would take. But getting the judgement takes huge time. Barakat and Roy (2004) show that the existing cases on the court need an average time of 9.5 years for settlement. The lengthy process of getting court judgement played impediment to go to the court.


Many of the women studied opined that the sons of the family take care of older parents and the ancestral land should therefore be given to them. Most of the female respondents said that the Islamic law, though unequal, is a religious stipulation which should be strictly followed.


Conclusion


The question remains whether the ambiguous stand of the government of Bangladesh in respect of the issue of equal distribution of inherited property is solely in response to wider sociopolitical, cultural and religious demands or is it supported by an inherent economic agenda of the dominant group, ie the males to hold monopoly over the means of production. If women cannot exercise their ownership over property even when the distribution is unequal, it is difficult to foresee how they would be able to gain their share when they would demand equal division. This process needs to be supported by the state machinery which is apparently not women friendly and the dominant ideology of the country is clearly against the proposition. Moreover, without taking into account the public opinion and social attitude towards women’s access to and control over property, no policy to establish equal rights can be implemented successfully. In addition the state has to overcome its inherent patriarchal nature and concentrate on steps to ensure that women at least get the benefit of the existing inheritance law. A national level campaigning through media should take place to sensitize people about the rights of women in property. Overall increase in the indicators of welling of women would enable them to exercise more control over their possessions.


ATM Shaifullah Mehedi is a researcher in Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies, since 2008 after completion his graduation in anthropology from Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh. His academic interests include food security, migration and human rights South Asia.


Nehraz Mahmud is currently pursuing her PhD in anthropology at Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada. She is a researcher in Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies. Her areas of her special interests include women’s rights, economic anthropology, South Asian studies and human agency in the context of social discrimination.






via Anthropology-News http://www.anthropology-news.org/index.php/2012/11/23/when-having-rights-is-not-right/