(Oxford University Press USA) Researchers are increasingly skeptical about the validity of bite-mark identification as trial evidence. A new paper in Journal of Law and the Biosciences describes the legal basis for the rise of bite-mark identification and reviews relevant empirical research on bite-mark identification -- highlighting both the lack of research and the lack of support provided by what research does exist.
from EurekAlert! - Social and Behavioral Science http://ift.tt/2gMArjU
No comments:
Post a Comment